Celestia's Bold Proposal: Abandoning PoS Amid $100M Team Sell-Off Sparks Trust Crisis

Celestia’s Governance Gamble: Innovation or Exit Strategy?
The PoG Proposal That Shook Crypto
When Celestia co-founder John Adler proposed replacing Proof-of-Stake (PoS) with “Proof-of-Governance” (PoG), my quant instincts tingled. The math was elegant - a 95% reduction in TIA issuance, elimination of staking contracts, and daily fee burns. On paper, it addressed inflation beautifully. But as any City analyst knows, elegant models often crash against human nature.
The numbers tell one story:
- 20x reduction in token emissions
- \(100-\)300 daily protocol revenue burned
- Validators paid directly without staking requirements
The $100 Million Elephant in the Room
Just as the community debated PoG’s merits, blockchain detectives uncovered something troubling: Celestia team wallets had quietly offloaded $109 million worth of TIA across OTC deals and exchanges. The largest single dump? A cool $27.3 million from address celestia1erglsz…
“I never sold a single TIA” - Celestia COO Nick White (Chain data suggests otherwise)
This isn’t FUD - it’s forensic accounting. When teams cash out nine figures during a “tokenomics revamp,” even my typically stoic INTJ personality raises an eyebrow.
Modular DA or Masterclass in Narrative Economics?
Let’s be intellectually honest:
- Celestia’s $35B valuation versus $500K annualized revenue smells like 2021 DeFi summer nostalgia
- Their “$100M funding round” coincided suspiciously with unlock dates
- Bankless promoters appeared conflicted about holdings
The real innovation here might be financial engineering rather than blockchain architecture.
The British Take: Cool Heads Needed
Having weathered LUNA’s collapse without blinking, I’ll offer measured analysis:
Potential Upsides: ✔️ Reduced inflation could stabilize TIA long-term ✔️ Removing slashing simplifies node operations ✔️ Challenges Ethereum’s staking dogma
Red Flags: ⚠️ Team selling undermines credibility ⚠️ “Governance” risks becoming permissioned PoA ⚠️ Revenue too low to sustain valuation
In classic London understatement: this situation warrants… careful monitoring.
#Final Thought Celestia may yet prove its modular thesis, but transparency must match technical ambition. As for me? I’ll stick to analyzing on-chain data rather than team Twitter threads.
ZKProofGuru
Hot comment (3)

¡Celestia nos sorprende otra vez!
Cuando pensábamos que Proof-of-Stake era lo más emocionante, llega Celestia con su “Proof-of-Governance”… y una “prueba-de-que-nos-fuimos-con-los-millones” 🏃💨
Los datos no mienten: $109M en ventas del equipo mientras prometían revolución tokenómica. Hasta el mate se me enfrió de la ironía.
Lo bueno: Menos inflación (¿o será menos confianza?). Lo malo: Transparencia que brilla por su ausencia.
¿Será el próximo LUNA? ¡Ustedes qué opinan, cracks! 🔍

Celestia का नया प्रस्ताव: साहसिक या संदिग्ध?
जब Celestia ने PoS को छोड़कर ‘Proof-of-Governance’ का प्रस्ताव रखा, तो लगा कि यह एक बड़ी तकनीकी छलांग होगी। परन्तु जैसे ही $100M के टोकन सेल का पता चला, सारा भरोसा धूमिल हो गया!
कहानी दो नंबरों की:
- 95% कम टोकन इश्यू
- $109M टीम सेल (चुपके से!)
अब सवाल यह है - क्या यह नवाचार है या सिर्फ़ एक ‘एग्ज़िट स्ट्रैटेजी’?
आपका क्या ख़्याल है? कमेंट में बताएं!
#CryptoSaga #TrustCrisis

Celestia’s Bold Move: Jual Saham Sambil Ganti Sistem?
Waktu Celestia ngomong mau ganti PoS jadi PoG, gw langsung mikir: ‘Ini beneran inovasi atau cuma alesan buat jual TIA?’ Apalagi pas ketauan timnya udah jual $100 juta diam-diam. Kayak ngegoreng bakwan pake minyak bekas, keliatannya enak tapi bau banget!
PoG vs PoS: Matematika Cantik, Realita Pahit
Di teori sih keren: inflasi turun 95%, fee dibakar tiap hari. Tapi di praktik? Timnya malah pada kabur bawa duit duluan. Kaya anak kos yang janji bayar listrik tapi malah kabur pas tagihan datang.
Yang Penting Jujur!
Kalau mau rebranding tokenomics, ya jangan sambil jualan sembunyi-sembunyi dong! Ini mah levelnya kayak influencer promo skincare tapi mukanya pake filter.
Gimana menurut kalian? Percaya sama ‘Proof-of-Governance’ atau ini cuma Proof-of-Greed? 😏
- NEM (XEM) 24-Hour Market Analysis: Volatility, Volume, and What It Means for TradersAs a blockchain analyst with 5 years in DeFi and NFT markets, I dissect NEM's (XEM) wild 24-hour ride: an 18.8% swing, $6M+ volume spikes, and turnover rates hitting 34%. We'll decode whether this is whale manipulation or organic momentum - with Python charts to back my thesis. Pro tip: Watch the $0.0024 resistance like I watch my vintage Game Boy collection.
- BarnBridge (BOND) 24-Hour Market Analysis: Volatility, Volume, and What It Means for Crypto InvestorsAs a fintech analyst with a keen eye on cryptocurrency trends, I break down BarnBridge's (BOND) recent 24-hour performance. With a 4.46% swing, trading volume fluctuations, and shifting turnover rates, this token is showing classic signs of mid-cap crypto volatility. I'll analyze the numbers, contextualize the movements, and offer insights for investors navigating these choppy waters. Spoiler: it's not just about the price—it's about understanding the underlying market mechanics.
- Reserve Rights (RSR) Price Analysis: A 7-Day Rollercoaster with 17.8% SurgeAs a fintech analyst, I dissect Reserve Rights (RSR)'s volatile week - from a 17.8% price surge to fluctuating trading volumes. This report examines key metrics like the $23.6M daily turnover and 31.65% exchange rate, offering data-driven insights for crypto investors navigating this unstable asset class. Spoiler: don't bet your tea money on single-day performances.
- SafePal (SFP) 7-Day Market Analysis: Volatility, Volume, and What It Means for Crypto InvestorsAs a seasoned fintech analyst, I delve into SafePal's recent 7-day performance, breaking down key metrics like price fluctuations, trading volume, and turnover rates. With a 3.37% peak gain and notable volatility, this analysis offers actionable insights for crypto investors navigating the current market landscape. Perfect for those who prefer data-driven decisions over hype.