�োমা-আক্রমণের দাবি

25শে June, Donald Trump-এর Twitter-এ ‘পারমাণবিক স设施গুলি ধ্বংস!’ –এইতো, vintage Trump: dramatic, declarative. CNN-এবং The New York Times-এর ‘downplay’-এর ‘দোষ’ও!

কিন্তু, Pentagon-এবং White House-ও quiet correction! Not denial—correction.

আসলেই What Happened?

Leaked intelligence report (later confirmed) according to US conducted major strike on Iranian nuclear sites. Fourteen 30,000-pound bombs—surgical precision. Uranium enrichment centers targeted.

White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt: “When fourteen 30K-pound bombs hit their targets? Only one result—complete destruction.”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth: “Operation dismantled Iran’s ability to produce weapons-grade material.” Trump promptly shared it as gospel.

Why This Matters Beyond Politics

This isn’t just about tweet war. Perception is now weaponized in modern warfare. If public believes Iran can’t build nukes—even without proof—the strategic effect is real. But here’s the cold truth: if it was decisive (no independent verification), why all quotes sound like press releases? Where are satellite images? Forensic analysis? Open-source tracking from Oryx/Bellingcat? We’re told ‘it works’ based on authority—not evidence.

Leaks & Credibility Crisis

Anonymous leaks are toxic when they fuel geopolitical drama without accountability. either side benefits when intelligence becomes political ammunition—ex-presidents boosting ratings or bureaucrats shaping narratives before elections. In my blockchain transparency work, trust comes from verifiable data—not performative declarations. Yet here we are: world’s most powerful nation relying on unnamed sources… while Trump declares victory at 2 AM UK time. Feels less strategy, more digital theater—with audiences too distracted by outrage loops to ask:

1. Did it work?
2. How do we know?
3. Who defines ‘destroyed’?

A Lesson in Skepticism for All Ages (Especially Investors)

digital assets taught me one thing: if you can’t verify it, you can’t trust it—even if everyone says so. The same applies here. When national security meets viral content, rationality gets buried under noise. The next time you hear ‘unprecedented success,’ ask three questions: p1) Who said it? p2) What proof exists? p3) Is this consistent across sources—or just one channel? too many decisions today hinge on emotional resonance rather than data integrity.